Things are currently pretty busy with a number of challenging projects on the go
One Particular project has been particularly challenging with a very interesting transfer structure which is dictated by the existing building below which we are building over, requiring us to transfer our perimeter columns from quite a few levels above!
Here is a image of the current transfer option which is being proposed
Transfer Structure |
The current scheme will have an exposed steelwork finish, the issue with this has been fire rating the support of the columns. To achieve this we have box girders which are formed by two 800mm deep girder beams with a concrete beam between the two beams at each column line.
Box Girder Section |
Fairly easy to model, but with the repetitive nature of the beam and the fact that the design is constantly being refined an adaptable family was the way to go. With the main problem having the layout reflected on plan accurately but clearly
Example of plan representation |
Box Girder Beam Family |
Both families were nested as shared allowing individual scheduling as required. Having them nested also allowed me to set each family to its appropriate material type under family category and parameters in the original family settings ensuring they show correctly on plan. The steelwork beams once nested also cut back nicely at support ends. For the concrete element I extended to ensure no cutback which ensures the ends trim nicely at supports and it also allowed me to cut by face where required at the curved column locations without affecting the steelwork
Example at support location |
Another interesting aspect of the transfer structure has been the inclined wishbone columns. I have always approached inclined columns with specific families as even with 2010 I found the slanted system family columns hard to maintain, although 2011 is quite a bit better
Inclined Wishbone Column |
Adding parameters for this one is fairly easy
Wishbone Column Family |
With a little research and setup things are going smoothly and having the ability to quickly adjust layout and geometry has been invaluable while still maintaining the accurate & readable linework plan
It has certainly be fun to work on! Let me know if you would like any more details
Cheers
Ben
To clarify, you nested steel and concrete beam families into a custom "composite" family, and then loaded into your project. Were these beam families out-of-the box or did you create custom profiles and insert them into your family? I'm also assuming you used instance parameters for the length. How did you keep the beams references from breaking? Were the beam orientations always horizontal--ie no need for any other parameter other than length?
ReplyDeleteBest regards,
Nick from Missouri
Both beams are custom, not OOTB. The concrete infill was specific only for this type of family, and not a standard RC beam, but the steel beam was the office standard for that beam type. All instance parameters can be mapped across in the composite family, constraints are an issue with the OOTB families, I had built the office families differently for this reason. If you dont mind having a specific family rather than using the standard beam, a simpler line based framing family is easier to constrain.
ReplyDelete